Why isn’t Building Information Modeling (BIM) given higher priority before construction begins? By starting with digital models, we can proactively identify issues, ensure proper fit, and uncover opportunities for prefabrication before any physical work begins.
Typically, BIM models only achieve Level of Development (LOD) 300, realistically speaking. However, during construction, the coordination and modeling often remain incomplete and are not followed through. This leads to on-site decisions being made based on assumptions or physical constraints, rather than referencing the digital model.
Consequently, BIM is often blamed for issues that arise during construction due to inadequate utilization. Either the initial model wasn’t comprehensive enough, or there wasn’t sufficient time allocated to complete necessary adjustments.
I am enthusiastic about participating in projects where BIM takes precedence before breaking ground. This approach would allow us to proactively identify errors, propose solutions, and optimize construction timelines through prefabrication and enhanced coordination.
Just imagine the potential gains in construction efficiency and speed if we invest ample time in meticulous planning before execution. While I understand the pressure of tight schedules, shouldn’t we prioritize addressing the underlying causes of these constraints rather than solely focusing on meeting deadlines?